Indian Journal of Urology
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION
Year
: 2002  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 95-

Priapism or Penile Prosthesis ?


Shivananda Prabhu, Erel AI Diaz, Shubha N Rao 
 KMC, Mangalore, India

Correspondence Address:
Shivananda Prabhu
KMC, Mangalore
India




How to cite this article:
Prabhu S, Diaz EA, Rao SN. Priapism or Penile Prosthesis ?.Indian J Urol 2002;19:95-95


How to cite this URL:
Prabhu S, Diaz EA, Rao SN. Priapism or Penile Prosthesis ?. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2002 [cited 2021 Jun 14 ];19:95-95
Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2002/19/1/95/20306


Full Text

A middle-aged male patient was admitted to the ICU under Neurology in a delirious condition. During exami­nation persistent erection of the penis was noticed. Fur­ther examination showed turgid corpora cavernosa while the spongiosum and the glans were soft. A provisional diagnosis of priapism was made and treatment was planned in consultation with the urologist.

Meanwhile, patient became oriented and enlightened us by saying he had a penile prosthesis thus saving him from treatment for imagined priapism. Repeat examina­tion failed to reveal any obvious surgical scar, nor any reservoir/pump. Presumably, patient had semi-rigid pros­thesis with the surgical scar having healed well.

We are reporting this instance to highlight the fact that a penile implant should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of priapism especially when the patient is un­able to give a proper history.[2]

References

1Lue TF, Hellstrom WJG, McAninch JWI, Tanagho EA. Priapism: A refined approach to diagnosis and treatment. J Urol 1986; 136: 104.
2Dorflinger T, Bruskewitz R. AMS malleable penile prosthesis. Urol­ogy 1986: 38: 480-485.