| This article has been cited by |
| 1 | Anatomic outcomes of sacrohysteropexy without posterior mesh placement in patients with asymptomatic grade 1 and 2 rectoceles: Is a rectouterine mesh really necessary? | |
| Adem Sanci,Khaled Obaid,Murat Topcuoglu,Mehmet Ilker Gokce,Evren Süer,Ömer Gülpinar |
| LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.2023;() |
| [DOI] |
|
| 2 | Is robotic-assisted sacrocolpo(hystero)pexy safe and effective in women over 65 years of age? | |
| Adem Sanci,Cagri Akpinar,Mehmet Ilker Gokce,Evren Süer,Omer Gülpinar |
| International Urogynecology Journal.2021;32(8)2211 |
| [DOI] |
|
| 3 | Surgical management of female pelvic organ prolapse with and without urinary incontinence | |
| Luigi Cormio,Vito Mancini,Giuseppe Liuzzi,Nicola d’Altilia,Giuseppe Carrieri |
| Medicine.2017;96(39)e7914 |
| [DOI] |
|
| 4 | Chronic Pelvic Pain, Quality of Life, and Patient Satisfaction After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse | |
| Nimesh Patel,Priyansh Faldu,Mohamed Fayed,Hannah Milad,Pradeep Nagaraju |
| Cureus.2022;96(39)e7914 |
| [DOI] |
|
| 5 | Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis | |
| Maribel De Gouveia De Sa,Leica Sarah Claydon,Barry Whitlow,Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona |
| International Urogynecology Journal.2016;27(3)355 |
| [DOI] |
|
| 6 | Perioperative adverse events in women over age 65 undergoing robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy | |
| Christopher X. Hong,Priyanka K. Halani,Naomi Gutkind,Heidi S. Harvie,Lily A. Arya,Uduak U. Andy |
| International Urogynecology Journal.2020;31(7)1463 |
| [DOI] |
|
| 7 | Robotic sacrocolpopexy with autologous fascia lata: A case series | |
| GianlucaRaffaello Damiani,Mario Villa,Giovanni Falcicchio,Cristina Cesana,Antonio Malvasi,Nico Picardi,Giovanni Vergottini,Poli Piero,Miriam Dellino,Vera Loizzi,Antonella Vimercati,Ettore Cicinelli,Antonio Pellegrino |
| Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2023;12(1)10 |
| [DOI] |
|
