Indian Journal of Urology Users online:5329  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 38  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 328
 

Author Reply Re: Sharma GR, Sharma AG, Sharma NG. Comparison of two drainage parameters on diuretic renogram in predicting the fate of prenatally detected pelvi-ureteric junction-like obstruction. Indian J Urol 2022;38:216-9


Department of Urology, Chitale Clinic Private Limited, Solapur, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission24-Jul-2022
Date of Acceptance26-Aug-2022
Date of Web Publication1-Oct-2022

Correspondence Address:
Gyanendra Ravindra Sharma
Department of Urology, Chitale Clinic Private Limited, Solapur, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_261_22

Rights and Permissions

 

How to cite this article:
Sharma GR, Sharma AG, Sharma NG. Author Reply Re: Sharma GR, Sharma AG, Sharma NG. Comparison of two drainage parameters on diuretic renogram in predicting the fate of prenatally detected pelvi-ureteric junction-like obstruction. Indian J Urol 2022;38:216-9. Indian J Urol 2022;38:328

How to cite this URL:
Sharma GR, Sharma AG, Sharma NG. Author Reply Re: Sharma GR, Sharma AG, Sharma NG. Comparison of two drainage parameters on diuretic renogram in predicting the fate of prenatally detected pelvi-ureteric junction-like obstruction. Indian J Urol 2022;38:216-9. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 3];38:328. Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2022/38/4/328/357732




Dear Sir,

We greatly appreciate the interest of the readers in our article.[1] We fully agree that a large multicenter trial is needed to establish the efficacy of normalized residual activity (NORA) and have mentioned this in our article. Whether NORA alone or along with t ½ or other parameter like cortical transit time can help to differentiate obstructed system from a dilated but nonobstructed system is still not clear.

The values of both NORA and t ½ suggest either good, partial, or poor drainage. The important question is do these drainage patterns suggest obstruction? Obstruction has been best defined by Koff as any impediment to urinary flow which, if left untreated, results in deterioration of renal function[2]. Going by this, the true evidence of obstruction is when there is loss of function. Hence, only those patients in whom the differential renal function fell below 40% were advised surgery and the drainage parameters suggested by NORA or t ½ were not taken into consideration for advising surgery. As mentioned above, only further studies will tell if these parameters help to predict the need for surgery in patients with prenatally detected presumed pelviureteric junction like obstruction.

During the follow-up of the 19 patients with t ½ values >20 min in whom surgery was not advised initially, none have needed surgery till date.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Sharma GR, Sharma AG, Sharma NG. Comparison of two drainage parameters on diuretic renogram in predicting the fate of prenatally detected pelvi – Ureteric junction - Like obstruction. Indian J Urol 2022;38:216-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  
2.
Koff SA. Problematic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1987;138:390.  Back to cited text no. 2
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (280 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed302    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded27    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal