Indian Journal of Urology Users online:1149  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
EDITORIAL
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 109-110
 

Lighting the candle at both ends: Burnout in urologists


Department of Urology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana, India

Date of Web Publication1-Apr-2021

Correspondence Address:
Arabind Panda
Department of Urology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_103_21

Rights and Permissions

 

How to cite this article:
Panda A. Lighting the candle at both ends: Burnout in urologists. Indian J Urol 2021;37:109-10

How to cite this URL:
Panda A. Lighting the candle at both ends: Burnout in urologists. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 7];37:109-10. Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2021/37/2/109/312914


Burnout was initially described by Freudenberger in 1980 in his book. 'Burn-out: The High Cost of High Achievement'as the “extinction of motivation or incentive.”[1] It has been subsequently expanded to include poor physical, mental, and emotional well-being. The concept was further developed by Christina Maslach who invented the Maslach burnout inventory which assesses three major areas – emotional exhaustion (a feeling of complete exhaustion by one's everyday work with nothing left in reserve), depersonalization (an impersonal treatment of patients as objects without empathy), and reduced sense of personal achievement (lack of feelings of competence in one's own work).[2] Burnout is a distinct entity, separate from fatigue, depression, and unhappiness with the current job or position.

While burnout has been documented in all major specialties across all major regions, it seems to have a greater prevalence among urologists. In 2020, a survey involving more than 15,000 doctors reported a burnout rate of 54% in urologists, the highest among surveyed specialties.[3]

In the 2016 annual census of the American Urological Association, 39% of urologists met the criteria for burnout.[4] These findings have been corroborated by multiple studies which have consistently shown urologists to have high burnout and low work–life satisfaction.[5]

Burnout results in reduced productivity, affects the quality of patient care, and affects physician health leading to substance abuse, depression/suicidal ideation, poor self-care, and potentially earlier retirement. It is, however, the elephant in the room that no one wants to see or talk about.

There are many reasons why urology is more affected. Traditionally, doctors choosing to be urologists are more ambitious and driven. The dissonance between expectation versus reality starts most often during training with up to 25% of residents experiencing burnout. It also tends to affect younger urologists disproportionally. The factors that most often cited include administrative responsibilities, increased volume of work, lack of institutional and management support, high patient expectations, and low salary/financial compensation. Very few seek professional support preferring to self-medicate or increase alcohol intake.[6]

There is a negative association between burnout and patient care. Emotional exhaustion and depersonalization results in less-than-optimal patient care practices and increased risk of medical errors. Burnout resulted in greater chances of reporting a major medical error in the next 3 months; additionally, adverse patient outcomes and longer recovery times for hospitalized patients post discharge have been reported.[7]

The direct impact on the health of the physician is significant. A 25% increased dependence on alcohol and substance abuse with a doubled risk of suicidal ideation has been reported in surgeons.[8] There is also a greater risk of motor vehicle accidents that is independent of fatigue.[9]

Urology practice in India is unique from other specialties in many ways. In the majority of cases, it is an individual practice by a single urologist. The unregulated evolution of health care and the lack of knowledge and training in managing a private practice places unusual stresses on the young urologist. The advantage of more autonomy in private practice is often negated by the increased pressure to meet revenue obligations.

The inequitable distribution of health care in India has resulted in the location of most health-care facilities in urban areas. This results in urologists competing for patients and being forced to freelance in poorly equipped centers. The consequent increased workload, longer working hours, reduced family and social time contribute to chronic fatigue and emotional exhaustion.

Additionally, the level of training in cloistered environments is in most cases not adequate to treat the complexity of urological and social issues in the real world. As the practice and workload increases, the lack of support to handle the stress leads to emotional exhaustion.

The lack of personal and family time often leads to emotional distress. In India, societal pressures and responsibilities toward one's extended family can result in an additional stressor that is not found in the west. Additionally, the breakdown of the doctor–patient relationship, the lack of trust, and increased patient expectations can only be addressed with focusing an extraordinary amount of energy on a single patient which is unsustainable in the long run.


   Strategies to Prevent Burnout Top


Since burnout tends to affect younger urologists and trainees more than the established urologist, it is imperative to mentor our junior colleagues in this vulnerable period of their careers. There is insufficient literature on the efficacy of intervention for burnout in general and for urologists in particular, however certain approaches appear reasonable.[10]

Interventions at the level of the individual:

  • A focus on recognizing the symptoms,
  • Committing to a level of workload that can be comfortably done without overreach
  • Schedules that maintain work–life balance
  • Having an extracurricular hobby
  • Encourage regular exercise.


Interventions at the organizational level:

  • Collaborative practice with increased teamwork
  • Adequate staffing to optimize the workload
  • A positive work environment
  • Effective and clear decision-making
  • Emphasis on improved communication at the workplace
  • Recognition of efforts
  • Personal wellness as a quality indicator at the workplace
  • Professional and personal development programs specifically tailored for preventing burnout
  • Wellness surveys for early recognition of warning signs
  • Departmental heads should set limits on workload, encourage skill development and mutual support.


The role of the urological societies both at a local and national level is crucial in this regard. The interventions, if properly implemented, are likely to result in a generation of happy urologists who commit lesser medical errors, provide better quality of patient care with improved patient satisfaction.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Freudenberger HJ, Richelson G. Burn-out: The High Cost of High Achievement. Garden City, New York: Anchor Press; 1980.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Occupat Behav 1981;2:99-113.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
4.
NorthA C, McKenna PH, Fang R, Sener A, McNeil BK, Franc-Guimond J, et al. Burnout in urology: Findings from the 2016 AUA annual census. Urol Pract 2018;5:489-94.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Shanafelt TD, Hasan O, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, Satele D, Sloan J, et al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:1600-13.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
O'Kelly F, Manecksha RP, Quinlan DM, Reid A, Joyce A, O'Flynn K, et al. Rates of self-reported “burnout” and causative factors amongst urologists in Ireland and the UK: A comparative cross-sectional study. BJU Int 2016;117:363-72.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
West CP, Huschka MM, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, Kolars JC, Habermann TM, et al. Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: A prospective longitudinal study. JAMA 2006;296:1071-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Dyrbye L, Bechamps G, Russell T, Satele D, et al. Special report: Suicidal ideation among American surgeons. Arch Surg 2011;146:54-62.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
West CP, Tan AD, Shanafelt TD. Association of resident fatigue and distress with occupational blood and body fluid exposures and motor vehicle incidents. Mayo Clin Proc 2012;87:1138-44.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Linzer M, Guzman-Corrales L, Poplau S. Preventing physician burnout. Available from: https://www.stepsforward.org/modules/physician-burnout. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 18].  Back to cited text no. 10
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (340 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Strategies to Pr...
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2322    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded144    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal