Indian Journal of Urology Users online:305  
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

  Table of Contents 
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 81-82

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with routine flexible nephroscopy for low-density renal stones


Date of Web Publication1-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.148310

Rights and Permissions


How to cite this article:
Sharma K. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with routine flexible nephroscopy for low-density renal stones. Indian J Urol 2015;31:81-2

How to cite this URL:
Sharma K. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with routine flexible nephroscopy for low-density renal stones. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Sep 28];31:81-2. Available from:

Routine flexible nephroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones with low density: a prospective, randomized study. Gücük A1, Kemahl? E, Üyetürk U, Tuygun C, Y?ld?z M, Metin A. J Urol. 2013;190:144-148

   Summary Top

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered the gold standard treatment for large complex renal calculi. However, it is difficult to visualize the entire intrarenal collecting system using a rigid nephroscope, [1] resulting in a disadvantage of an increased number of access points. A flexible nephroscope facilitates access to portions of the collecting system that might not be accessible using a rigid instrument. [2] This decreases morbidity due to the shearing force of rigid nephroscopy as well as the decreased number of access points, with increasing success rate in terms of stone clearances. In this study, patients undergoing PCNL for stones greater than 2 cm, between March 2011 and July 2012 (n = 80), were prospectively randomized into two groups. [3] Standard PCNL (n = 40) using a rigid nephroscope was included in group 1, whereas in addition to standard PCNL, flexible nephroscopy, laser lithotripsy or basket stone extraction were used in group 2 (n = 40). After 3 months post-operatively, patients were evaluated by plain X-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder and ultrasound or unenhanced computerized tomography. The study included 61 males (76.3%) and 19 females (23.8%), with a mean + SD age of 43.75 + 12.4 years (range 19-74). The groups were homogenous in mean age and similar in mean stone size, location and HU density. The primary measure of surgical success was stone-free rate, which was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (92.5% vs. 70%, P = 0.022). The stone-free rate was significantly higher in patients with a stone density of less than 677.5 HU (100% vs. 64.7%, P = 0.018).

   Comments Top

It is difficult to visualize residual stone fragments, especially of low density, by conventional fluoroscopy as well as by intraoperative ultrasound. [4] Thus, it is possible to improve PCNL efficacy by flexible nephroscopy. [5] In the current series, flexible nephroscopy was performed concomitantly with conventional PCNL to decrease the need for second-look nephroscopy, which is costly and undesirable for the patient and the surgeon.

The number of access sites and supracostal access were found to be lower in the flexible nephroscopy-added group, with the primary advantage of better stone-free status and fewer complications in terms of blood loss and hemothorax. The mean number of access sites was 1.4 in group 1 with conventional PCNL and 1.1 in group 2 with flexible nephroscopy (P = 0.019). The operative time in group 2 was slightly longer (88.8 ± 28.3 min (45-160) vs. 95.4 ± 29.3 min (55-185), P = 0.263). The post-operative hematocrit decrease was 6.2% in group 1 and 3.2% in group 2. Using a flexible nephroscope requires some expertise. Due to difficult orientation, fluoroscopic and operative times can be prolonged. Performing 16Fr flexible nephroscopy through the 28Fr access sheath used with a rigid nephroscope can cause irrigation fluid leakage around the sheath.

Although using a flexible nephroscope, LASER and stone retrieval basket add to the cost of the procedure, considering the morbidity of residual calculi and need of second procedure or extracorporeal lithotripsy, the option seems reasonable. Routine flexible nephroscopy is a logical, effective method that provides even more efficacy in patients with low HU density stones. Flexible nephroscopy decreased the number of access points and blood loss volume and increased the stone-free rate, especially in patients with low HU density stones. Because residual stones cannot be properly identified during conventional PCNL, a precise determination of surgical success is not possible. [5] Problems associated with residual stone imaging and the difficulty of reaching some inaccessible stones with a rigid nephroscope decreased the surgical success rate and increased the morbidity rate. Improved instrument design, such as flexible nephroscopes, nitinol graspers and forceps, and the introduction of the holmium: YAG laser, ultrasound and pneumatic devices have led to an increase in the PCNL stone-free rate.

   References Top

Williams SK, Leveillee RJ. Management of staghorn calculus: Single puncture with judicious use of the flexible nephroscope. Curr Opin Urol 2008;18:224-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
Knudsen BE. Second-look nephroscopy after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Ther Adv Urol 2009;1:27-31.  Back to cited text no. 2
Gücük A, Kemahlý E, Üyetürk U, Tuygun C, Yýldýz M, Metin A. Routine flexible nephroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones with low density: A prospective, randomized study. J Urol. 2013;190:144-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
Ray AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT, Honey RJ. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology 2010;76:295-300.  Back to cited text no. 4
Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Drake S, Holtz C, Rosenberg MS, Bretzke CA. Intraoperative fragment detection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Evaluation of high magnification rotational fluoroscopy combined with aggressive nephroscopy. J Urol 2006;175:162-5.  Back to cited text no. 5


Print this article  Email this article


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (188 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded91    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal