|
|
LETTER TO EDITOR |
|
|
|
| Year : 2010 | Volume
: 26
| Issue : 3 | Page : 463 |
| |
Authors' reply
Rishi Nayyar, Prabhjot Singh, Narmada P Gupta, Ashok K Hemal, Prem N Dogra, Amlesh Seth, Rajeev Kumar
Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| Date of Web Publication | 1-Oct-2010 |
Correspondence Address:
Narmada P Gupta
Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110 029
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
PMID: 21116381 
How to cite this article:
Nayyar R, Singh P, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Dogra PN, Seth A, Kumar R. Authors' reply. Indian J Urol 2010;26:463 |
Dear Editor,
We thank Dr. Gautam [1] for his comments on the subject.[2] We totally agree with his observation and sincerely feel that it's high time to develop uropathology as a specialized branch. urological pathology especially prostate has caught every ones eye all over the world and accurate pre-treatment pathological staging can only help in optimal treatment modality selection be it radical surgery, radiation, minimally invasive treatments or surveillance. Apart from this we do not feel any clarifications or elaborations are needed on this subject.
 References | |  |
| 1. | Gautam G. Perspectives on the upgradation of Gleason score after radical prostatectomy: Why our uropathologists need to remain abreast with current concepts. Indian J Urol 2010;26:458-9.  |
| 2. | Nayyar R, Singh P, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Dogra PN, Seth A, et al. Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: An Indian experience. Indian J Urol 2010;26:56-9. [PUBMED]  |
|
