Indian Journal of Urology Users online:1554  
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

Year : 2010  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 296-298

Non-catheter simple noninvasive bladder draining method with no costs

Materials Department, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

Date of Web Publication12-Jul-2010

Correspondence Address:
M G Hocking
Materials Dept, Imperial College, London , SW7 2AZ
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.65409

Rights and Permissions


Objectives: To develop a simple, rapid (8 min) non-invasive non-catheter method for draining urine from the bladder, with no introduction of infection. This is of interest to men with incomplete or no bladder emptying, and also to those with a large diverticulum. There are no running costs. It could also be cautiously explored for use by neo-bladder patients and for use in various conditions of poor detrusor function.
Materials and Methods: This method is based on postural drainage used in physiotherapy. A carefully graded application of pressure, kneeling, with torso horizontal, facing downwards, supported by a 12-inch square stool-top, gave passive low-pressure voiding. If the abdominal contents approximate to a non-elastic viscous fluid, such pressure is transmitted uniformly everywhere (isostatic) and so will be equal both outside and inside the bladder, and, both outside and inside the ureters connected to it. Even if this assumption is not made, calculations show that the pressure is normally less than would cause upper tract damage. Starting with a low force was important for avoiding any upper tract damage (ureter dilation, and possible refluxing back into the kidney). Initially, a partial pre-emptying by normal urination was done (if feasible). A final stage employed a simple plastic crescent shape. Website: .
Results: Average residual bladder volumes were 43 mL.
Conclusions: The method was tested for four years on one patient with low-pressure chronic retention and found successful: no complications, infections, or adverse effects.

Keywords: Crede, diverticulum, no catheter, TURP, urine retention, without catheter

How to cite this article:
Hocking M G. Non-catheter simple noninvasive bladder draining method with no costs. Indian J Urol 2010;26:296-8

How to cite this URL:
Hocking M G. Non-catheter simple noninvasive bladder draining method with no costs. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2021 Dec 5];26:296-8. Available from:

   Introduction Top

A new bladder drainage method is described, with major advantages: no catheters required, no discomfort, no risk of introduction of infection, requires no special equipment, no running costs, rapid, self-applied, passive (requires no muscle exertion). These are of special relevance to India where many patients may not afford self-catheters (over 700 per year needed) and antibiotics.

The method described here may be considered by urologists for anyone who has difficulty emptying their bladder if not caused by an obstruction, who presently relies on the Crede maneuver or on self-catheterization. It must not be used to overcome an obstructed urethra (e.g. caused by an enlarged prostate or by a defective urethral sphincter or a stricture).

In this single-patient case report, no complications, no infections nor adverse effects were ever experienced over the four-year study. Frequent ultrasound scans showed no urinary stones and annual blood tests showed renal function to remain completely normal. Frequent ultrasound studies throughout the whole four-year test period showed that there were no enlarged ureters and a preexisting diverticulum did not enlarge. The detrusor hypofunction and the large diverticulum were caused by chronic urine retention prior to prostatectomy (TURP).

The aim is to give passive low-pressure voiding by a carefully graded application of pressure. Starting with a low force is important for avoiding any upper tract damage (ureter dilation, and possible refluxing back into the kidney). Thus, a pre-emptying of whatever volume is feasible by a normal urination (if feasible), or by moderate hand pressure, was done first. Urine volume voided is much increased if an egestion (bowel emptying) was done just beforehand.

   Materials and Methods Top

A simple noninvasive method is described for draining the bladder and partially draining any diverticulum present. This method is based on postural drainage used in physiotherapy but is not mentioned in any of the standard texts on Urology (as at 2005). Method (b) required only two flat-top kitchen stools, or a miniature table. See [Figure 1] for Stage 1.

A 1-liter plastic beaker was required, of about 4΍ inches top diameter.

For Stage 2, the three-inch gap was closed. For Stage 3 a rubber crescent shape was used. [Figure 2] shows the bladder region after the essential preliminary "normal" urination, but before starting on the main drainage procedure. [Figure 3] shows the final result after the whole procedure.

Voided volumes are quite variable because they depend on when and how much fluid was drunk, what diet was eaten (e.g. % fruit in it), what volume of food was eaten and when, the time elapsed since the last urination and since the last egestion (bowel emptying), how full the bowel is, and how much fluid is lost in other ways (in sweat and in breath, depending on climate and activity). Such factors are not easily controllable in this type of study. For these reasons, not much significance should be placed on the standard deviation values in Column 1 of [Table 1]. The Column 2 values are more insulated from these factors.

To reduce some of the above factors and to obtain some uniformity, the following regime was followed for this Table:

The measurements were taken (on consecutive days) as soon as the patient got up in the morning, instead of later during the day. No preliminary "normal" urination was done (for the purpose of these measurements only).

After Stage 1 of the method, an egestion was done (but no urination with it) before resuming the next stages. The patient normally eats a high-fruit-content diet (which helps this method) and in the previous evenings a banana was eaten to ensure that this egestion was feasible. {Note: Egestion just before (or during, by interrupting) the method gives more complete, and therefore more uniform, bladder emptying than if the bowel is full or part full.}

[Table 1] was produced with the patient totally relaxed - i.e. not trying to empty the bladder by contracting the detrusor muscle.

The total early morning voided volumes above are rather high due to the subject having slept (habitually) in a cold room, which increases urine volume.

   Acknowledgements Top

Discussions are gratefully acknowledged with: Prof P.D. Abel, Professor of Urology, Imperial College, London. Prof Kim Parker, Physiological Flow Section, Bioengineering Department, Imperial College, London. Mr A.K. Nigam, Consultant Urological Surgeon, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK. Dr M. Olsen and Dr N.S. Sidky, Toronto.


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]

  [Table 1]


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article


   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (717 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Materials and Me...
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded137    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal