|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 44-47
Management of BCG non-responders with fixed dose intravesical gemcitabine in superficial transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder
NK Mohanty, Rajiba L Nayak, Pawan Vasudeva, RP Arora
Department of Urology, VM Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
N K Mohanty
C-II/124, Moti Bagh-I, New Delhi - 110 021
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aims and Objectives: The incidence of bladder malignancy is increasing worldwide and the projected rise is 28% by 2010 for both sexes (WHO). Though intravesical adjuvant therapy with BCG is superior to any other immunotherapeutic/chemotherapeutic agent in reducing tumor recurrences and disease progression, its real efficacy remains controversial as one-third of the patients will soon become BCG failure. Hence there is a need for an alternative intravesical agent for treatment of BCG failure. Our aim was to study the efficacy, tolerability and safety of intravesical Gemcitabine in managing BCG-refractory superficial bladder malignancy.
Materials and Methods: Thirty-five BCG failure patients, 26 males and nine females between 20-72 years of age were instilled with 2000 mg of Gemcitabine in 50 ml of normal saline intravesically two weeks post tumor resection, for six consecutive weeks. Mean follow-up was for 18 months with cystoscopies.
Results: Twenty-one patients (60%) showed no recurrences, 11 patients (31.4%) had superficial recurrences while three patients (8.6%) progressed to muscle invasiveness. Average time to first recurrence was 12 months and to disease progression was 16 months. Adverse event was low and mild. Therapy was well tolerated.
Conclusion: Gemcitabine fulfils all requirements as an alternative agent, in treating BCG failure patients with low adverse events, is well tolerated and highly effective in reducing tumor recurrences.
Keywords: BCG, gemcitabine, non-responders
|How to cite this article:|
Mohanty N K, Nayak RL, Vasudeva P, Arora R P. Management of BCG non-responders with fixed dose intravesical gemcitabine in superficial transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder. Indian J Urol 2008;24:44-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Mohanty N K, Nayak RL, Vasudeva P, Arora R P. Management of BCG non-responders with fixed dose intravesical gemcitabine in superficial transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2022 Jul 1];24:44-7. Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2008/24/1/44/35759
Incidence of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of urinary bladder is increasing worldwide with a projected rise of 28% by 2010 for both sexes (WHO). This malignancy is particularly important for the social system of industrialized countries. After initial therapy by trans urethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), 75-80% will recur within one year and 20-25% will progress to muscle invasiveness if no adjuvant therapy is considered.
Intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmitte Guerin (BCG) is the best intravesical adjuvant therapeutic agent in reducing tumor recurrences and disease progression in the intermediate-risk (Ta/T1-Gr.I-II, multifocal, size >3 cm) and high-risk (T1G3, CIS) group as per European guidelines. ,
Although BCG is currently considered the most effective agent in reducing recurrence rate and disease progression rate in superficial bladder cancer (SBC), its real efficacy remains controversial. A two-year follow-up with BCG showed a 40% recurrence rate.  Peyromaure et al.,  reported a 42% and 28% recurrence and progression rate respectively in 57 patients followed up for 53 months with BCG therapy. Recent studies have shown that BCG is effective in only two-thirds of SBC while one-third will be non-responders.  Those SBC and CIS that fail to respond to initial BCG therapy are defined as BCG failures or non-responders.  Post BCG therapy recurrences show poor prognosis for whom radical cystectomy remains the only treatment option. The side-effect profile of 120 mg BCG represents another limiting factor for its use intravesically.
Chemotherapeutic agents such as Mitomycin-C and Doxorubicin in spite of the low probability of systemic side-effects can give rise to severe chemical cystitis.  Recent studies have shown good results with intravesical electromotive Mitomycin-C instillation.
Again, following conventional intravesical chemotherapy, the short-term recurrence rate of intermediate-risk SBC cannot be reduced by more than 15-20% and long-term risk of recurrence by 6% according to Lamn. 
Hence there is a need for a new intravesical agent for the treatment of the intermediate and high-risk SBC groups who do not respond to initial BCG therapy.
Systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for locally advanced muscle invasive bladder cancer has shown promising results , with low side-effects and good tolerance as an alternative treatment option to conventional radical cystectomy.
Gemcitabine, a deoxycytidine analogue has broad-spectrum anti-tumor activity and being a non-vesicant drug has very little local toxicity; hence high concentration in bladder could be achieved without drug-induced cystitis. It substantially penetrates bladder mucosa better, unlike Mitomycin-C, due to its lower molecular weight of 299 Da and preferentially produces cytotoxicity in bladder cancer cells while sparing non-transferred bladder mucosa and submucosal cells. Its rapid transformation into an inactive metabolite helps prevent systemic toxicity.
On the basis of the high relative advantage for regional therapy with gemcitabine and proven efficacy on systemic administration against invasive cancer bladder we undertook the following study with an aim to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fixed dose intravesical gemcitabine (2000 mg) weekly for six weeks for two hours duration in only those patients with superficial bladder cancer who had experienced failure to previous intravesical therapy with BCG.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a prospective, single-arm, non-randomized study conducted between January 2004 and December 2006.
Patients with superficial TCC of urinary bladder (Ta, T1 and all grades) who had earlier indications for BCG therapy i.e. multiple tumors, size more than 3 cm and of younger age group but had shown repeated recurrence on follow-up were recruited in our study. This is a continuous ongoing study. Other eligibility criteria to be included in this study were age more than 18 years, good performance status, normal hepatic, renal and hemocritic values and patients consent. Patients with at least one of the following criteria were excluded from this study i.e. evidence of locally invasive or metastatic bladder cancer (T2), presence of upper tract malignancy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy received within 12 weeks of initiation of the study and unresolved UTI.
Between January 2004 and December 2006, a total number 35 such BCG failure patients were included in our study with an average age of 54 years (20-72 years). All these 35 patients underwent trans urethral resection of bladder tumor. Histology confirmed superficial in nature (Ta/T1) of all grades. This subgroup showed multiple tumor recurrences of size > 3cm and designated as BCG non responders. They were subsequently subjected to intravesical instillation of gemcitabine (Gemcel) 2000 mg dissolved in 50 ml of normal saline (0.9%) weekly for six consecutive weeks. Intravesical therapy was started one week post TURBT. Each instillation lasted for 2 h. Alkalinization of urine was done during therapy by asking the patients to take systemic alkalizer a day prior to therapy so as to get better absorption of gemcitabine. Fluid intake restriction and complete emptying of bladder was done routinely prior to therapy in order to improve therapeutic efficacy. Periodic follow-up with urine for cytology, NMP22, ultrasonography and cystoscopies at three-monthly interval i.e. at third, sixth, ninth and 12 th month for the first year and thereafter every six-monthly was done. The total number of cystoscopies the patient underwent during 18 months follow-up was six.
| Results|| |
All these 35 patients had initially undergone intravesical therapy with BCG after TURBT since they fulfilled the inclusion criteria for adjuvant therapy with BCG i.e. Ta/T1 stage, multiple tumors and size more than 3 cm. On periodic follow-up they showed repeated multiple recurrences hence were designated as BCG refractory which entitled them to receive intravesical gemcitabine. The histology grade of these 35 patients before therapy is shown in [Table - 1].
At the end of 18 months follow-up 21 patients (60%) showed no tumor recurrences, 11 patients (31.4%) showed superficial tumor recurrences and three patients (8.6%) showed muscle invasiveness. Average time to first recurrence was 12 months and average time to disease progression was 16 months.
Four patients (8.75%) had side-effects in the form of nausea, cystitis, frequency of urination, hematuria and neutropenia [Table - 2]. None of these 35 patients discontinued therapy due to adverse effects. All instillation was for 2 h weekly for six consecutive weeks. Patients' compliance was good.
In our series [Table - 1] a total number of eight patients having Grade I tumor (Ta-5 and T1-3) had multiple tumors (more than three and size >3cm) at the beginning hence it was thought appropriate to start intravesical adjuvant BCG on them initially after TURBT as they were falling under the intermediate risk group as per European Guidelines.
| Discussion|| |
Pharmacokinetic data from different phase studies clearly demonstrates that systemic absorption of intravesical gemcitabine is minimal and transient and this is unlikely to produce clinically significant adverse events.
In vitro cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine in intravesical therapy showed selective cytotoxicity to human and rodent TCC cell line with relative sparing of fibroblast suggesting its effectiveness in SBC.  Another in vitro study comparing gemcitabine, epirubicin, mitomycin-C and adriamycin on TCC cell culture showed cytotoxic activity 90% lethality to TCC with gemcitabine as compared to the other drugs mentioned for which it was less than 60%. 
Recent studies using the marker lesions concept to measure the ablative efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine on intermediate-risk SBC have shown 56% complete response  and 50% complete response in high-risk SBC. 
Efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine on BCG failure cases has shown encouraging results.  Bouzid K et al.,  showed reduction in tumor recurrences in BCG refractory cases to be very significant with one-year follow-up. Similar positive results were published by Berardinist De et al.,  Gontero P et al.,  Dalbagni G et al.  and Serretta V. 
Laufer  in his study has shown that plasma concentration of gemcitabine decreased during the time that gemcitabine was left in the bladder indicating that it is the initial influx of gemcitabine into the bladder rather than the presence of the drug in the bladder which may be critical for systemic absorption.
Based on these experimental findings and favorable pharmacokinetic properties of gemcitabine, the role of its intravesical use on BCG refractory SBC patients seems to be not only feasible but also scientific with a good response rate.
Our study of 35 BCG failure patients with fixed dose of intravesical gemcitabine (2 g) weekly for 2 h for six consecutive weeks with 18 months follow-up showed very encouraging results and in 91.4% of these patients the bladder could be salvaged for 18 months, otherwise cystectomy would have to be performed.
Intravesical gemcitabine has so far shown an excellent safety profile with minimal toxicity at a concentration of 40 mg/ml.  Instillation time of one and two hours have both been tested with excellent tolerability.  Based on this excellent safety profile of intravesical instillation, as early as 3 h post TURBT has been recently advocated. Because of its low and transient adverse events and excellent cytotoxic effect, more intense treatment schedules are now being contemplated like every four weeks after initial dose of weekly for six weeks or six-instillation course twice a week for three weeks or even a 12-instillation course biweekly for six weeks.
Though our study is small it is very encouraging. However, a larger randomized clinical trial in future is needed to authenticate our results.
| Conclusion|| |
Intravesical gemcitabine seems to have fulfilled all the requirements of an alternative agent in managing BCG failure patients with superficial bladder cancer in whom bladder can be salvaged but warrants further investigation with respect to its anti-tumor activity with marker lesion concept, its tolerability and long-term efficacy.
| References|| |
|1.||Oosterlinck W, Lobel B, Jakse G, Malmstrom PU, Stockle M, Sternberg C, et al . Guidelines on bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2002;41:105-12. |
|2.||Huncharek M, Kupelnick B. Impact of Intravesical chemotherapy vs BCG immunotherapy on recurrences of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: Meta analytic reevaluation. Am J Clin Oncol 2003;26:402-7. |
|3.||Bohle A, Jocham D, Bock PR. Intravesical BCG vs Mitomycin-C for superficial bladder cancer: A formal meta-analysis of comparative studies on recurrences and toxicity. J Urol 2003;169:90-5. |
|4.||Peyromaure M, Guerin F, Amsellem QD, Saighi D, Debre B, Zerbib M. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy for stage T1 Grade III TCC of the bladder: recurrences, progression and survival in a study of 57 patients. J Urol 2003;169:2110-2. |
|5.||Evans CP. Intravesical Gemcitabine shows promise in intermediate risk superficial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2004;46:339-43. |
|6.||Herr HW, Dalbagni G. Defining Bacillus Calmette Guerin refractory superficial bladder tumors. J Urol 2003;169:1706-8. |
|7.||Konety BR, Williams RD. Superficial transitional (Ta/T1/CIS) cell carcinoma of the bladder. BJU Int 2004;94:18-21. |
|8.||Lamm DL. Intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer: Slow but steady progress. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4259-60. |
|9.||Stadler WH, Kuzel T, Roth B, Raghavan D, Dorr FA. Phase II study of single agent Gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:3394-8. |
|10.||Lorusco V, Pollera CF, Antimi M, Luporini G, Gridelli C, Frassineti GL, et al . A phase-II study of gemcitabine in patients with TCC of the urinary tract previously treated with platinum. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:1208-12. |
|11.||Kilani RT, Tamini Y, Karmali S, Mackey J, Hanel EG, Wong KK, et al . Selective cytotoxicity of Gemcitabine in bladder cancer cell lines. Anticancer Drugs 2002;13:557-66. |
|12.||O'Donnell MA, Evanoff D, Luo Y. Studies on gemcitabine as an intravesical agent for superficial bladder cancer. J Urol Suppl 2003;4:508. |
|13.||Gontero P, Casetta G, Maso G, Sogni F, Pretti G, Zitella A, et al . Phase II study to investigate the ablative efficacy of intravesical administration of Gemcitabine in intermediate risk superficial bladder cancer (SBC). Eur Urol 2004;46:339-43. |
|14.||Dalbagni G, Russo P, Bochner B, Ben-Porat L, Sheinfeld J, Sogani P, et al . Phase II trial of intravesical gemcitabine in bacille Calmette-Guιrin-refractory transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2729-34. |
|15.||Bartoletti R, Gacci M, Cai T. Adjuvan intravesical gemcitabine in intermediate or high risk transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. J Clin Orthod 2004;38:4601. |
|16.||Bouzid K, Ferhat A, Bounedjar A, Mahfouf H, Smaili K, Adjali K. Intravesical Gemcitabine single agent as adjuvant chemotherapy in superficial TCC of the bladder. J Clin Orthod 2004;22:A4601. |
|17.||De Berardinis E, Antonini G, Peters GJ, Loves WJ, Van der Born K, Codacci-Pisanelli G, et al . Intravesical administration of gemcitabine in superficial bladder cancer: A phase I study with pharmacodynamic evaluation. BJU Int 2004;93:491-4. |
|18.||Serretta V, Pavone C, Galuffo A. A phase I-II study on intravesical Gemcitabine in superficial bladder papillary tumors. J Urol 2004;171:A272. |
|19.||Laufer M, Ramalingam S, Schoenbarg MP, Wolf ME. Intravesical gemcitabine therapy for superficial TCC of the bladder: A phase-I and pharmacokinetic study. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4, 697-703. |
[Table - 1], [Table - 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Role of Tumor Suppressor and Angiogenesis Markers in Prediction of Recurrence of Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
| ||Usha Agrawal, Ashwani K. Mishra, Payal Salgia, Saurabh Verma, Nayan K. Mohanty, Sunita Saxena |
| ||Pathology & Oncology Research. 2010; |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|
||Intravesical gemcitabine for treatment of superficial bladder cancer not responding to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine
| ||Mohamed Ali Elkoushy |
| ||African Journal of Urology. 2010; 16(4): 110 |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|
||Efficacy of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Therapy and Cauterization of the Tumor Versus BCG Therapy Without Cauterization for Superficial Bladder Cancer
| ||Siavash Falahatkar, Ali Roshani, Atefeh Ghanbari, Seyedeh Maryam Asadi, Marzieh Akbarpour, Negin Khaki |
| ||UroToday International Journal. 2009; 2(4) |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|