|Year : 2007 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 35-42
Pathogenesis of prostate cancer and hormone refractory prostate cancer
JS Girling, HC Whitaker, IG Mills, DE Neal
CRUK Uro-oncolgy Group, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, CB2 2XZ, United Kingdom
D E Neal
Department of Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, P O Box 193, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 2QQ
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy in males and the leading cause of cancer death. Prostate cancer is initially androgen dependent and relies upon the androgen receptor (AR) to mediate the effects of androgens. The AR is also the target for therapy using antiandrogens and LHRH analogues. However, all cancers eventually become androgen independent, often referred to as hormone refractory prostate cancer. The processes involved in this transformation are yet to be fully understood but research in this area has discovered numerous potential mechanisms including AR amplification, over-expression or mutation and alterations in the AR signaling pathway. This review of the recent literature examines the current knowledge and developments in the understanding of the molecular biology of prostate cancer and hormone refractory prostate cancer, summarizing the well characterized pathways involved as well as introducing new concepts that may offer future solutions to this difficult problem.
Keywords: Prostate cancer; refractory androgen receptor
|How to cite this article:|
Girling J S, Whitaker H C, Mills I G, Neal D E. Pathogenesis of prostate cancer and hormone refractory prostate cancer. Indian J Urol 2007;23:35-42
|How to cite this URL:|
Girling J S, Whitaker H C, Mills I G, Neal D E. Pathogenesis of prostate cancer and hormone refractory prostate cancer. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2007 [cited 2022 Dec 5];23:35-42. Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2007/23/1/35/30265
Prostate cancer is the commonest malignancy in men, accounting for 24% of all cancers in the UK in 2003. The treatment of prostate cancer varies with the disease stage at diagnosis and includes surgical, radiotherapeutic and medical interventions. Initially, prostate cancer requires androgens such as testosterone, or the more potent dihydrotestosterone (DHT), for growth and is therefore referred to as androgen dependent. Steroidal androgens exert their effects by binding to the androgen receptor (AR) in the cytoplasm of cells promoting nuclear translocation. Once in the nucleus the AR binds to specific DNA sequences androgen response elements (ARE's) and promotes transcription of androgen-regulated genes that control cellular growth, differentiation and apoptosis. One such gene is prostate specific antigen (PSA) the well characterized marker of prostate cancer.
As a result, treatment for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer targets the AR by reducing the levels of androgens or by inhibiting the activation of the AR. Androgens are removed by either surgical or chemical methods using luteinising-hormone-releasing-hormone (LHRH) analogues with or without the addition of antiandrogens. Initially, prostate tumors regress in response to androgen deprivation in up to 80% of cases. However, tumors eventually begin to grow, despite continued antiandrogen treatment, progressing to metastatic and ultimately fatal prostate cancer within 24-48 months. Tumor growth in these late stages is termed androgen independent or hormone refractory. The mechanism of progression from androgen dependent to independent disease remains poorly understood.,, It is thought that tumor cells either bypass or alter the AR activation pathway to allow continued growth, e.g., by AR amplification, mutation or modification or that hormone refractory cells may express aberrant levels of cofactors or activate the AR via alternative signaling pathways. This review examines the current knowledge of the molecular biology of prostate cancer and hormone-resistant prostate cancer focusing on the putative pathways involved in the progression to hormone refractory disease.
| The androgen receptor (AR)|| |
Androgens are essential to the normal development and biology of the prostate. The majority of testosterone is produced by the testes, with a smaller contribution of androgens (5%) from the adrenal glands. These androgens are metabolized by 5a-reductase to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) which binds to the androgen receptor (AR). Ligand binding initiates phosphorylation, homodimerisation of the AR and dissociation of heat-shock proteins, allowing translocation of the AR complex to the nucleus. Here the AR binds to specific DNA sequences called androgen response elements (ARE) promoting transcription of androgen-responsive genes. Such genes control a range of cellular events such as growth, differentiation and apoptosis [Figure - 1]. The AR is a member of the steroid receptor superfamily and functions as a ligand-dependent transcription factor. The majority of the nuclear receptors, including the AR, share a common structure composed of four domains: an N-terminal domain (NTD), central DNA-binding domain (DBD), hinge region and C-terminal ligand-binding domain (LBD) [Figure - 2]. Transcription is mediated by two activation function domains (AF-1 and AF2). The AF2 is contained within the LBD and the binding of the hormone induces the conformational changes necessary for its activation. However, unlike other steroid receptors the AF-1 region of the AR has been shown to be most important for transactivation and can be activated even in the absence of hormone. This is supported by recent data demonstrating that activation of AF-1 alone is responsible for AR activation in hormone refractory cells, even in the presence of antiandrogens. This would clearly be possible if the ligand binding does not effect conformational changes in the NTD.
As hormone refractory prostate cancer continues to grow in the presence of antiandrogens the term hormone independence may be misleading as it implies that the AR is no longer required for growth. However, the AR is expressed throughout the progression of prostate cancer, including >80% of hormone refractory tumors, suggesting that AR signaling remains essential., It has also been shown that over-expression of the AR alone is sufficient to promote hormone refractory disease. Indeed, the persistence of AR in the metastatic LNCaP cell line and continued nuclear expression of hormone refractory tumor samples is indicative of continued AR involvement.
Amplification of the AR gene is rarely identified in untreated cases of prostate cancer. Using comparative genome hybridization (CGH) and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), 30% of treated cases exhibited AR amplification.,, Patients exhibiting amplification have been shown to have an improved response to hormone manipulation with a relapse time of >12 months. Identical techniques were also used to identify chromosomal aberrations, among which 8q amplification was the most consistent finding in up to 90% of locally advanced and metastatic tumors. Amplification of the AR gene does not always result in over-expression of AR mRNA or protein. However, several studies have shown a correlation between AR amplification and AR protein expression., Conversely, AR over-expression does occur in the absence of AR amplification and there is growing evidence that in all except the small minority of small cell prostate tumors AR is ubiquitously expressed. In particular, AR expression is known to be increased in hormone refractory disease allowing activation by adrenal androgens. Using micro-array genome-wide profiling of xenograft models comparing androgen ablation treated and untreated prostate cancer, Chen et al demonstrated that over-expression of AR cDNA, mRNA and protein levels were the only consistent and significant differences. In patients, AR over-expression conferred a better response to combined androgen blockade but despite this it also correlates with poorer outcome.
Despite medical or surgical castration, tumor levels of androgens in human prostate samples, in particular DHT, have been shown to remain at levels sufficient to transactivate the AR in cell line studies. Although serum testosterone is reduced by 95% following castration, tissue levels of DHT remain as high as 40% suggesting that through intracrine processing within the prostate, adrenal androgens are transformed into the 10 times more potent DHT [Figure - 3]. Following studies in androgen-regulated cell lines which indicated an increase in apoptosis and reduction in proliferation, the use of 5a-reductase inhibitors are currently being assessed as a potential adjuvant agent.
Mutations in the AR are uncommon (0-4%) in untreated prostate cancer and those treated with surgical castration. However, in hormone refractory tumors the incidence of mutations increases by up to 50%. Over 70 AR mutations have been found in association with prostate cancer with the majority being point mutations resulting in a single amino acid substitution. Within the AR, mutations predominantly occur in the ligand-binding domain including T887A which is also found in LNCaP, a prostate cancer cell line derived from lymph node metastases.,,, This mutation permits binding and activation of the AR by a wide variety of ligands including antiandrogens and estrogens, permitting cyproterone acetate and flutamide to bind and activate the AR and altering the nuclear translocation of bicalutamide-bound AR. When T877A is found in association with another mutation L701H, glucocorticoids can bind and activate the receptor. The H874Y mutated AR has also been shown to bind flutamide and the adrenal androgen dehydroepiandrosterone and become activated. These gain-of-function mutations of AR lead to the failure of conventional antiandrogen therapies. There is growing evidence suggesting that antiandrogens can select for mutated receptors capable of activation. Taplin demonstrated that only 6% of patients treated with monotherapy exhibited AR mutated compared to 31% in patients on a combined regime containing flutamide. A similar study with bicalutamide saw 36% of patients with mutated ARs. In both studies the mutated receptors were capable of being activated by the antiandrogens, suggesting that cells containing mutated receptors may be selected by antiandrogen treatment.
Modulation of AR activity by co-repressors and co-activators
The ARE-bound AR binds a number of proteins to enable efficient recruitment of the basal transcriptional machinery and transcription of androgen-regulated genes. The transcriptional activity of the AR is enhanced by co-activators and inhibited by co-repressors although some proteins can either promote or repress transcription depending upon the cellular context. Co-activators are essential for effective steroid receptor-mediated transcription. After binding to the liganded AR in the nucleus, co-activators catalyze the recruitment of chromatin-remodeling proteins such as histone acetyl-transferases (HATs). The HAT proteins modify histone tails giving rise to a more open chromatin structure capable of binding the transcription initiation machinery. Recruitment of co-activators is regulated by AR acetylation by proteins such as p300 and Tip60, which is itself upregulated by androgen ablation. It has been suggested that over-expression of co-activators may provide a mechanism for transition to hormone refractory prostate cancer by amplifying the response to adrenal androgens. ARA70 was first identified as an AR-specific co-activator although it has since been shown to co-activate other steroid receptors., Probably the most extensively studied group of AR co-activators is the p160 family which includes steroid receptor co-activator -1 (SRC1), glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein -1(GRIP-1) also known as transcriptional intermediary factor-2 (TIF-2) and receptor-associated co-activator-3 (RAC-3).
The p160 co-activators are known to interact with CREB-binding protein (CBP) and its homologue p300 which have intrinsic HAT activity., The primary role of CBP/p300 when bound to p160 co-activators is to act as a co-integrator, collating multiple proteins into an integrated HAT response at promoters. Immunohistochemical studies of CBP expression of in-tumor samples were inconclusive with Debes et al showing an increase in hormone refractory disease whereas Linja et al found no significant difference in expression. As yet no studies have looked at matched samples pre and postandrogen ablation therapy. The CBP has been shown to enhance the agonistic properties of flutamide, increasing AR transactivation in the prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP and DU145.
Probably the best characterized co-activator of the AR is SRC-1. In cell line studies reduction of SRC-1 expression significantly reduced growth and altered AR target gene regulation in the LNCaP cell line whereas it had no effect on the growth of the AR-negative PC-3 and DU145 prostate cancer cell lines, further emphasizing the need for an intact AR. In a study of cell lines and clinical prostate samples SRC-1 was expressed at higher levels in high-grade prostate cancer samples and this was supported by significant over-expression of both SRC-1 and TIF-2 in hormone refractory compared to hormone-naοve prostate cancer., However, Linja et al found a decrease in the median expression of SRC-1 suggesting that sample collection, processing and the sensitivity of the detection method may influence co-activator expression studies.
GRIP-1/TIF-2 has previously been shown to bind the steroid receptors including the AR via its LBD and promote transcription of androgen-regulated reporter genes. The AR mutation N727K results in sub-fertility at least in part by abrogating GRIP-1/TIF-2 binding. Using domain constructs it was shown that GRIP-1/TIF-2 enhances AF-2 but not AF-1 mediated AR transactivation. Bicalutamide has been shown to block recruitment of GRIP-1/TIF-2, presumably by preventing the formation of a co-activator binding surface. Using reverse transcriptase PCR GRIP-1/TIF and RAC-3 were found at low levels in prostate cancer specimens suggesting it may not be as significant as SRC-1 in prostate cancer progression.
Expression of RAC-3 (also known as SRC-3) was higher in prostate cancer cell lines expressing the AR and has been shown to promote ligand-independent activation of the Akt pathway. RAC-3 mRNA and protein expression in prostate cancer cells has been shown to correlate with tumor grade and stage and increased expression correlates with poor survival in clinical studies.
Adaptor proteins associated with receptor internalization at the cell surface have also been reported to be prostate cancer biomarkers and to act as transcriptional co-regulators. Two examples of these proteins are Huntingtin Interacting Protein 1 (HIP1) and cyclin G-associated kinase (GAK), both of which were initially implicated in clathrin-mediated receptor trafficking., Subsequently, they were shown to be over-expressed in prostate cancer and in the case of GAK to be upregulated following prolonged androgen ablation therapy (greater than six months)., It was then proposed that changes in their expression could prevent the cell from effectively internalizing activated growth factor receptors for degradation and so potentiate signaling., Both GAK and HIP1 have however been reported to associate with the AR and to co-activate the receptor., The degree to which adaptors directly affect steroid hormone receptor signaling, as opposed to indirectly through the perturbation of growth factor receptor trafficking and signaling in prostate cancer, remains to be resolved.
Steroid receptor activity can also be modified by co-repressors which inhibit transcription by blocking co-activators binding and recruiting histone deacetylases (HDACs) and repressor proteins such as Sin3A. This HDAC complex gives rise to a more condensed chromatin structure, hindering the recruitment of the basal transcription machinery. There is also evidence of co-repressor recruitment by antagonist-bound receptors suggesting that a loss of co-repressor expression could lead to increased AR transactivation. Silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT) and nuclear receptor co-repressor (N-CoR) have been identified as co-repressors of AR. The SMRT interacts with both liganded and unliganded forms of AR reducing transactivation. Recruitment is enhanced in the presence of cyproterone acetate and bicalutamide., However, as yet there is no evidence that expression differs with prostate cancer progression. Recently, HDAC-7 has been shown to repress AR transactivation in the presence of DHT. Both cyproterone acetate and bicalutamide-bound AR co-localized with HDAC-7 in nuclear bodies suggesting it may be essential for inhibiting AR function.
| Ligand-independent androgen receptor activation|| |
Classically, activation of the AR via the binding of androgens initiates receptor phosphorylation and/or acetylation, homodimerization dissociation of heat-shock proteins, allowing translocation of the AR complex to the nucleus. The AF-1 region of the N-terminal of the AR can be activated even in the absence of ligand thereby circumventing current hormonal therapies. Ligand-independent activation induces phosphorylation and acetylation of the AR altering its conformational and subsequent transactivation. Phosphorylation increases AR stability and stabilizes AR homodimers increasing AR signaling without ligand. However, phosphorylation needs to occur at specific sites to permit the conformation change necessary for nuclear translocation. Many pathways have been identified as being involved in this process with the best characterized being mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt [Figure - 4]. Both pathways can be initiated by growth hormones such as insulin-like-growth factor (IGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and Her-2/Neu - an EGF-related molecule.
The PI3K-Akt pathway is involved in processes controlling cell growth, survival, cycle regulation and apoptosis. Following growth receptor activation, PI3K phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol (3, 4)-bisphosphate (PIP2) to phosphatidylinositol (3, 4, 5)-trisphosphate (PIP3). Akt and its activating kinases, phosphoinositide-dependent kinases 1 and 2 (PDK1 and PDK2), then localize to the membrane. Here, activated Akt can activate a myriad of substrates and consequently a vast number of intracellular events including phosphorylation of AR. A recent study investigating the expression of the three isoforms of Akt demonstrated differential staining during prostate cancer progression. Akt1 correlated with high prostate specific antigen (PSA) whereas Akt3 correlated with invasion, metastases and hormone refractory disease. PTEN is a phosphatase that opposes the function to PI3K, dephosphorylating PIP3 and deactivating Akt, thus operating as a tumor suppressor. Loss of PTEN results in Akt activation and a subsequent reduction in apoptosis. Loss of PTEN has been shown to correlate with tumor recurrence and progression to androgen independence. In a model using PTEN ± mice, usually susceptible to the development of multiple tumors, the inhibition of Akt reduced the onset of malignancy, most significantly in prostate cancer reinforcing the role of Akt in prostate carcinogenesis.
Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) are a family of serine/threonine protein kinases involved in many cellular programs such as cell proliferation, cell differentiation and apoptosis. The MAPK signaling cascades are organized hierarchically into three-tiered modules: MAPK-kinase kinases (MAPKKKs) are in activated by interaction with the family of small GTPases and/or other protein kinases. MAPKKKs are phosphorylated and activate (MAPKKs), which in turn phosphorylate and activate MAPK-kinases (MAPKs). The MAPK pathways terminate with the proteins JNK, ERK and p38 which are known to be involved in both anti- and pro-apoptotic processes. There is conflicting evidence regarding the significance of the MAPK pathway in prostate cancer progression. Initial reports suggested a significant correlation between the activation of MAPK enzymes ERK1 and ERK2 and tumor grade, with 70% of high-grade tumors exhibiting activation. In two patients with matched pre and postablation therapy they demonstrated absence and presence of activation respectively. However, Uzgare et al reported that although there was a slight increase in ERK and p38 in well-differentiated cancers, cells from hormone refractory prostate cancer had reduced or absent activated expression of isoforms. Furthermore, Malik et al found a decrease in activated form phospho-MAPK/ERK in high-grade tumors.
Her-2/Neu is known to play a significant role in the progression of breast cancer raising interest in this molecule as a potential target in prostate cancer. Her2/Neu can activate AR via the MAPK and PI3K-Akt pathways and over-expression in LNCaP cells inhibits growth arrest by 35% compared to wild-type LNCaP cells. The potential importance of Her-2/Neu was highlighted in a xenograft model used to produce progressively more androgen-independent tumors, in which the level of Her-2/Neu expression increased 25-fold. This is reinforced by human immunohistochemical studies that demonstrate a significantly positive correlation between Her-2/Neu expression and hormone independent status when comparing hormone-naοve and advanced hormone refractory disease.,
Growth factors and their receptors have previously been shown to be essential for prostate growth and differentiation during development, in particular FGF-7 and 10. FGF-8 and receptors 1 and 4 in particular have also been linked to prostate cancer and shown to activate the MAPK and PI3K pathways. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) is essential for the normal development and transformation of cells. IGF can activate the AR to levels similar to DHT possibly by dephosphorylation of AR serine 650 which prevents its nuclear export. Activation of the AR was blocked by bicalutamide suggesting that the activation is mediated through the AR. Cell studies comparing different stages of prostate cancer have also demonstrated IGF receptor (IGFR) protein expression changes. Initially IGFR is over-expressed driving malignant transformation but levels in hormone refractory prostate cancer are reduced - a finding confirmed at the mRNA level in a transgenic mouse model. EGF binding to the EGFR on the surface of cells is known to activate the MAPK pathway and potentiate GRIP1 co-activation of the AR. Many studies have looked at the expression of EGFR (also known as ErbB1). Hernes et al compared biopsy samples from the same patient taken before and after the development of hormone refractory disease and found a significant increase in EGFR from 23 to 43% after hormone relapse. Other studies have found no significant differences between the expression of EGFR and Her-2/Neu in matched hormone-sensitive and hormone-relapsed tumors. There was also a significant decrease in survival time following hormone treatment with increased expression of either EGFR or Her-2/Neu. While the data suggests there is some variation in the significance of growth factor signaling in prostate cancer, a growing body of evidence supports the hypothesis that it is likely to be important in progression to hormone independence.
In addition to growth factor signaling other extracellular proteins are known to activate cell surface receptors and the AR. The best characterized of these proteins is interleukin-6 (IL-6), a cytokine previously linked to a number of malignancies including renal, myeloma and prostate. IL-6 has wide-ranging cellular effects consistent with activation of multiple pathways including MAPK and PI3-Akt. Cell studies have confirmed that IL-6 can induce ligand-independent AR transactivation via a mechanism which is blocked by bicalutamide and inhibitors of MAPK and protein kinase A. When IL-6 expression was examined in patient serum and prostate tissue both demonstrated upregulation in hormone refractory cancers. IL-4 has also been shown to be upregulated in the serum of hormone refractory prostate cancer patients via activation of the AF-1 region of the AR.
| The role of prostate cancer stem cells in hormone refractory disease|| |
The classical stochastic model of cancer development is based on the theory that every cell within a tumor has the potential to form a new tumor colony. However, the stem cell model of tumorigenicity proposes that it is a minority of specialized stem cells that give rise to cancer cells. Prostate cancer stem cells are reported to be AR-negative making them resistant to androgen ablation. The surviving stem cell is then able to proliferate resulting in a resistant tumor recurrence. This would account for the heterogeneity of tumor masses whereby the stem cells then go on to develop to different degrees of differentiation and molecular characteristics and would suggest that in order to accurately characterize and treat prostate cancer, it is necessary to focus on the stem cells. Techniques have been developed to identify stem cells within tumors and primary prostate cancer cell lines by utilizing the over-expression of the integrin a 2 b 1 and CD133 as markers. However, the limited number of prostate cancer stem cells available (<0.1% of tumor bulk) has limited profiling studies to date. The potential of being able to target the tumor-initiating cells provides an exciting prospect for diagnosis and targeted therapies.
| Summary|| |
The development and progression of prostate cancer is a complex process. The androgen signaling pathway and its interaction with other pathways impacts on cellular processes from growth, cell cycle, differentiation to growth arrest and apoptosis. Through adaptation and alteration cells become tumorigenic. Initially this process can be halted by manipulating the cells' requirement for androgens although eventually this treatment fails and cancer cells resume growth. The terms 'androgen independent' and 'hormone refractory' may be misnomers as the AR appears to maintain a role in cancer progression as demonstrated by its continued and even increased expression. There is also evidence that despite castration, both surgical and medical, the prostate retains a level of androgen that is high enough to induce AR transactivation in prostate cancer cell lines. The AR mutations and over-expression also enable transactivation to occur at low levels of androgen as well as decreasing ligand specificity. The upregulation of co-activators and possible downregulation of co-repressors further potentiate these effects. Alternative pathways involving growth factors and receptors and IL-6 have been shown to interact with the androgen signaling pathway enabling transactivation to occur even in the absence of ligand.
These processes are unlikely to operate independently. In fact the heterogeneity of prostate cancer, both hormone-naοve and hormone refractory, indicate that a multifactorial, multistep process is the most plausible. This could be a double-edged sword. The presence of numerable potential targets and markers is encouraging, particularly if tumor profiling can be utilized. However, it is also an indication of the likely complexities to be faced when designing therapies for the multiple types of prostate cancers. Recent advances have highlighted many potential and targets for pathway inhibition. By targeting multiple pathways, including AR signaling, it is feasible that it may possible to treat patients with tumor-specific 'tailor-made' therapies in the future.
| References|| |
|1.||Office for National Statistics. Cancer statistics - registrations, England, 2003. Series MB1 no. 34. Office for National Statistics. London; 2005. |
|2.||Huggins C, Hodges CV. Studies on prostatic cancer: The effects of castration, of oestrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res 1941;1:293-7. |
|3.||Denis L, Murphy GP. Overview of phase III trials on combined androgen treatment in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer 1993;72:3888-95. |
|4.||Trachtenberg J, Blackledge G. Looking to the future. Advances in the management of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Eur Urol Suppl 2002;1:44-53. |
|5.||Tilley WD, Clarke CL, Birrell SN, Bruchovsky N. Hormones and cancer: New insights, new challenges. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2001;12:186-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|6.||Grossmann ME, Huang H, Tindall DJ. Androgen receptor signalling in androgen-refractory prostate cancer. Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1687-97. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|7.||Kasper S, Cookson MS. Mechanisms leading to the development of hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2006;33:201-10. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|8.||Bevan C, Parker M. The role of coactivators in steroid hormone action. Exp Cell Res 1999;253:349-56. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|9.||Dehm SM, Tindall DJ. Ligand-independent androgen receptor activity is activation function-2-independent and resistant to antiandrogens in androgen refractory prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2006;281:27882-93. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|10.||van der Kwast TH, Schalken J, Ruizeveld de Winter JA, van Vroonhoven CC, Mulder E, Boersma W, et al . Androgen receptors in endocrine-therapy-resistant human prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 1991;48:189-93. |
|11.||Linja MJ, Savinainen KJ, Saramaki OR, Tammela TL, Vessella RL, Visakorpi T. Amplification and over-expression of androgen receptor gene in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2001;61:3550-5. |
|12.||Chen CD, Welsbie DS, Tran C, Baek SH, Chen R, Vessella R, et al . Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy. Nat Med 2004;10:33-9. |
|13.||Gregory CW, Hamil KG, Kim D, Hall SH, Pretlow TG, Mohler JL, et al . Androgen receptor expression in androgen-independent prostate cancer is associated with increased expression of androgen-regulated genes. Cancer Res 1998;58:5718-24. |
|14.||Koivisto P, Kononen J, Palmberg C, Tammela T, Hyytinen E, Isola J, et al . Androgen receptor gene amplification: A possible molecular mechanism for androgen deprivation therapy failure in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1997;57:314-9. |
|15.||Bubendorf L, Kononen J, Koivisto P, Schraml P, Moch H, Gasser TC, et al . Survey of gene amplifications during prostate cancer progression by high-throughout fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays. Cancer Res 1999;59:803-6. |
|16.||Visakorpi T, Hyytinen E, Koivisto P, Tanner M, Keinanen R, Palmberg C, et al . In vivo amplification of the androgen receptor gene and progression of human prostate cancer. Nat Genet 1995;9:401-6. |
|17.||Ford OH 3rd, Gregory CW, Kim D, Smitherman AB, Mohler JL. Androgen receptor gene amplification and protein expression in recurrent prostate cancer. J Urol 2003;170:1817-21. [PUBMED] |
|18.||Edwards J, Krishna NS, Witton CJ, Bartlett JM. Gene amplifications associated with the development of hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:5271-81. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|19.||Palmberg C, Koivisto P, Kakkola L, Tammela TL, Kallioniemi OP, Visakorpi T. Androgen receptor gene amplification at primary progression predicts response to combined androgen blockade as second line therapy for advanced prostate cancer. J Urol 2000;164:1992-5. [PUBMED] |
|20.||Titus MA, Schell MJ, Lih FB, Tomer KB, Mohler JL. Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone tissue levels in recurrent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:4653-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|21.||Nishiyama T, Hashimoto Y, Takahashi K. The influence of androgen deprivation therapy on dihydrotestosterone levels in the prostatic tissue of patients with prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:7121-6. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|22.||Mizokami A, Koh E, Fujita H, Maeda Y, Egawa M, Koshida K, et al . The adrenal androgen androstenediol is present in prostate cancer tissue after androgen deprivation therapy and activates mutated androgen receptor. Cancer Res 2004;64:765-71. |
|23.||Maria McCrohan A, Morrissey C, O'Keane C, Mulligan N, Watson C, Smith J, et al . Effects of the dual 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on apoptosis in primary cultures of prostate cancer epithelial cells and cell lines. Cancer 2006;106:2743-52. |
|24.||Gottlieb B, Beitel LK, Lumbroso R, Pinsky L, Trifiro M. Update of the androgen receptor gene mutations database. Hum Mutat 1999;14:103-14. |
|25.||Bott SR, Arya M, Shergill IS, Williamson M. Molecular changes in prostatic cancer. Surg Oncol 2005;14:91-104. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|26.||Gaddipati JP, McLeod DG, Heidenberg HB, Sesterhenn IA, Finger MJ, Moul JW, et al . Frequent detection of codon 877 mutation in the androgen receptor gene in advanced prostate cancers. Cancer Res 1994;54:2861-4. |
|27.||Taplin ME, Bubley GJ, Ko YJ, Small EJ, Upton M, Rajeshkumar B, et al . Selection for androgen receptor mutations in prostate cancers treated with androgen antagonist. Cancer Res 1999;59:2511-5. |
|28.||Avila DM, Zoppi S, McPhaul MJ. The androgen receptor (AR) in syndromes of androgen insensitivity and in prostate cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2001;76:135-42. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|29.||Waller AS, Sharrard RM, Berthon P, Maitland NJ. Androgen receptor localisation and turnover in human prostate epithelium treated with the antiandrogen, casodex. J Mol Endocrinol 2000;24:339-51. |
|30.||Zhao XY, Malloy PJ, Krishnan AV, Swami S, Navone NM, Peehl DM, et al . Glucocorticoids can promote androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells through a mutated androgen receptor. Nat Med 2000;6:703-6. |
|31.||Tan J, Sharief Y, Hamil KG, Gregory CW, Zang DY, Sar M, et al . Dehydroepiandrosterone activates mutant androgen receptors expressed in the androgen-dependent human prostate cancer xenograft CWR22 and LNCaP cells. Mol Endocrinol 1997;11:450-9. |
|32.||Buchanan G, Irvine RA, Coetzee GA, Tilley WD. Contribution of the androgen receptor to prostate cancer predisposition and progression. Cancer Metasasis Rev 2001;20:207-23. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|33.||Haapala K, Hyytinen ER, Roiha M, Laurila M, Rantala I, Helin HJ, et al . Androgen receptor alterations in prostate cancer relapsed during a combined androgen blockade by orchiectomy and bicalutamide. Lab Invest 2001;81:1647-51. |
|34.||Jimenez-Lara AM, Heine MJ, Gronemeyer H. PIAS3 (protein inhibitor of activated STAT-3) modulates the transcriptional activation mediated by the nuclear receptor coactivator TIF2. FEBS Lett 2002;526:142-6. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|35.||Spencer TE, Jenster G, Burcin MM, Allis CD, Zhou J, Mizzen CA, et al . Steroid receptor coactivator-1 is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature 1997;389:194-8. |
|36.||Fu M, Wang C, Zhang X, Pestell RG. Acetylation of nuclear receptors in cellular growth and apoptosis. Biochem Pharmacol 2004;68:1199-208. |
|37.||Miyamoto H, Yeh S, Wilding G, Chang C. Promotion of agonist activity of antiandrogens by the androgen receptor coactivator, ARA70, in human prostate cancer DU145 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;93:7379-84. |
|38.||Alen P, Claessens F, Schoenmakers E, Swinnen JV, Verhoeven G, Rombauts W, et al . Interaction of the putative androgen receptor-specific coactivator ARA70/ELE1alpha with multiple steroid receptors and identification of an internally deleted ELE1beta isoform. Mol Endocrinol 1999;13:117-28. |
|39.||Chen H, Lin RJ, Schiltz RL, Chakravarti D, Nash A, Nagy L, et al . Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300. Cell 1997;90:569-80. |
|40.||Sheppard HM, Harries JC, Hussain S, Bevan C, Heery DM. Analysis of the steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC1)-CREB binding protein interaction interface and its importance for the function of SRC1. Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:39-50. |
|41.||Lee YH, Koh SS, Zhang X, Cheng X, Stallcup MR. Synergy among nuclear receptor coactivators: Selective requirement for protein methyltransferase and acetyltransferase activities. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:3621-32. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|42.||Debes JD, Sebo TJ, Lohse CM, Murphy LM, Haugen de AL, Tindall DJ. p300 in prostate cancer proliferation and progression. Cancer Res 2003;63:7638-40. |
|43.||Linja MJ, Porkka KP, Kang Z, Savinainen KJ, Janne OA, Tammela TL, et al . Expression of androgen receptor coregulators in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:1032-40. |
|44.||Comuzzi B, Lambrinidis L, Rogatsch H, Godoy-Tundidor S, Knezevic N, Krhen I, et al . The transcriptional co-activator cAMP response element-binding protein-binding protein is expressed in prostate cancer and enhances androgen- and anti-androgen-induced androgen receptor function. Am J Pathol 2003;162:233-41. |
|45.||Agoulnik IU, Vaid A, Bingman WE 3rd, Erdeme H, Frolov A, Smith CL, et al . Role of SRC-1 in the promotion of prostate cancer cell growth and tumor progression. Cancer Res 2005;65:7959-67. |
|46.||Fujimoto N, Mizokami A, Harada S, Matsumoto T. Different expression of androgen receptor coactivators in human prostate. Urology 2001;58:289-94. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|47.||Gregory CW, He B, Johnson RT, Ford OH, Mohler JL, French FS, et al . A mechanism for androgen receptor-mediated prostate cancer recurrence after androgen deprivation therapy. Cancer Res 2001;61:4315-9. |
|48.||Berrevoets CA, Doesburg P, Steketee K, Trapman J, Brinkmann AO. Functional interactions of the AF-2 activation domain core region of the human androgen receptor with the amino-terminal domain and with the transcriptional coactivator TIF2 (transcriptional intermediary factor2). Mol Endocrinol 1998;12:1172-83. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|49.||Karvonen U, Janne OA, Palvimo JJ. Pure antiandrogens disrupt the recruitment of coactivator GRIP1 to colocalize with androgen receptor in nuclei. FEBS Lett 2002;523:43-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|50.||Gnanapragasam VJ, Leung HY, Pulimood AS, Neal DE, Robson CN. Expression of RAC3, a steroid hormone receptor co-activator in prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2001;85:1928-36. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|51.||Waelter S, Scherzinger E, Hasenbank R, Nordhoff E, Lurz R, Goehler H, et al . The huntingtin interacting protein HIP1 is a clathrin and alpha-adaptin-binding protein involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:1807-17. |
|52.||Zhang CX, Engqvist-Goldstein AE, Carreno S, Owen DJ, Smythe E, Drubin DG. Multiple roles for cyclin G-associated kinase in clathrin-mediated sorting events. Traffic 2005;6:1103-13. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|53.||Rao DS, Hyun TS, Kumar PD, Mizukami IF, Rubin MA, Lucas PC, et al . Huntingtin-interacting protein 1 is overexpressed in prostate and colon cancer and is critical for cellular survival. J Clin Invest 2002;110:351-60. |
|54.||Ray MR, Wafa LA, Cheng H, Snoek R, Fazli L, Gleave M, et al . Cyclin G-associated kinase: A novel androgen receptor-interacting transcriptional coactivator that is over-expressed in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 2006;118:1108-19. |
|55.||Hyun TS, Ross TS. HIP1: Trafficking roles and regulation of tumorigenesis. Trends Mol Med 2004;10:194-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|56.||Rao DS, Bradley SV, Kumar PD, Hyun TS, Saint-Dic D, Oravecz-Wilson K, et al . Altered receptor trafficking in Huntingtin Interacting Protein 1-transformed cells. Cancer Cell 2003;3:471-82. |
|57.||Mills IG, Gaughan L, Robson C, Ross T, McCracken S, Kelly J, et al . Huntingtin interacting protein 1 modulates the transcriptional activity of nuclear hormone receptors. J Cell Biol 2005;170:191-200. |
|58.||McKenna NJ, Lanz RB, O'Malley BW. Nuclear receptor coregulators: Cellular and molecular biology. Endocr Rev 1999;20:321-44. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|59.||Liao G, Chen LY, Zhang A, Godavarthy A, Xia F, Ghosh JC, et al . Regulation of androgen receptor activity by the nuclear receptor corepressor SMRT. J Biol Chem 2003;278:5052-61. |
|60.||Yoon HG, Wong J. The corepressors silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor and nuclear receptor corepressor are involved in agonist- and antagonist-regulated transcription by androgen receptor. Mol Endocrinol 2006;20:1048-60. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|61.||Karvonen U, Janne OA, Palvimo JJ. Androgen receptor regulates nuclear trafficking and nuclear domain residency of corepressor HDAC7 in a ligand-dependent fashion. Exp Cell Res 2006;312:3165-83. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|62.||Wong HY, Burghoorn JA, Van Leeuwen M, De Ruiter PE, Schippers E, Blok LJ, et al . Phosphorylation of androgen receptor isoforms. Biochem J 2004;383:267-76. |
|63.||Lin HK, Hu YC, Yang L, Altuwaijri S, Chen YT, Kang HY, et al . Suppression versus induction of androgen receptor functions by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in prostate cancer LNCaP cells with different passage numbers. J Biol Chem 2003;278:50902-7. |
|64.||Le Page C, Koumakpayi IH, Alam-Fahmy M, Mes-Masson AM, Saad F. Expression and localization of Akt-1, Akt-2 and Akt-3 correlate with clinical outcome of prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2006;94:1906-12. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|65.||Bertram J, Peacock JW, Fazli L, Mui AL, Chung SW, Cox ME, et al . Loss of PTEN is associated with progression to androgen independence. Prostate 2006;66:895-902. |
|66.||Chen ML, Xu PZ, Peng XD, Chen WS, Guzman G, Yang X, et al . The deficiency of Akt1 is sufficient to suppress tumor development in Pten+/- mice. Genes Dev 2006;20:1569-74. |
|67.||Gioeli D, Mandell JW, Petroni GR, Frierson HF Jr, Weber MJ. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase associated with prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res 1999;59:279-84. |
|68.||Uzgare AR, Kaplan PJ, Greenberg NM. Differential expression and/or activation of P38MAPK, erk1/2 and jnk during the initiation and progression of prostate cancer. Prostate 2003;55:128-39. |
|69.||Malik SN, Brattain M, Ghosh PM, Troyer DA, Prihoda T, Bedolla R, et al . Immunohistochemical demonstration of phospho-Akt in high Gleason grade prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:1168-71. |
|70.||Shi Y, Brands FH, Chatterjee S, Feng AC, Groshen S, Schewe J, et al . Her-2/neu expression in prostate cancer: High level of expression associated with exposure to hormone therapy and androgen independent disease. J Urol 2001;166:1514-9. |
|71.||Signoretti S, Montironi R, Manola J, Altimari A, Tam C, Bubley G, et al . Her-2-neu expression and progression toward androgen independence in human prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1918-25. |
|72.||Thompson TC. Growth factors and oncogenes in prostate cancer. Cancer Cells 1990;2:345-54. |
|73.||Kwabi-Addo B, Ozen M, Ittmann M. The role of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in prostate cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2004;11:709-24. |
|74.||Culig Z, Hobisch A, Cronauer MV, Radmayr C, Trapman J, Hittmair A, et al . Androgen receptor activation in prostatic tumor cell lines by insulin-like growth factor-I, keratinocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor. Cancer Res 1994;54:5474-8. |
|75.||Plymate SR, Tennant MK, Culp SH, Woodke L, Marcelli M, Colman I, et al . Androgen receptor (AR) expression in AR-negative prostate cancer cells results in differential effects of DHT and IGF-I on proliferation and AR activity between localized and metastatic tumors. Prostate 2004;61:276-90. |
|76.||Kaplan PJ, Mohan S, Cohen P, Foster BA, Greenberg NM. The insulin-like growth factor axis and prostate cancer: Lessons from the transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate (TRAMP) model. Cancer Res 1999;59:2203-9. |
|77.||Gregory CW, Fei X, Ponguta LA, He B, Bill HM, French FS, et al . Epidermal growth factor increases coactivation of the androgen receptor in recurrent prostate cancer. J Biol Chem 2004;279:7119-30. |
|78.||Hernes E, Fossa SD, Berner A, Otnes B, Nesland JM. Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor family in prostate carcinoma before and during androgen-independence. Br J Cancer 2004;90:449-54. |
|79.||Bartlett JM, Brawley D, Grigor K, Munro AF, Dunne B, Edwards J. Type I receptor tyrosine kinases are associated with hormone escape in prostate cancer. J Pathol 2005;205:522-9. |
|80.||Hobisch A, Eder IE, Putz T, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Klocker H, et al . Interleukin-6 regulates prostate-specific protein expression in prostate carcinoma cells by activation of the androgen receptor. Cancer Res 1998;58:4640-5. |
|81.||Twillie DA, Eisenberger MA, Carducci MA, Hseih WS, Kim WY, Simons JW. Interleukin-6: A candidate mediator of human prostate cancer morbidity. Urology 1995;45:542-9. |
|82.||Hobisch A, Rogatsch H, Hittmair A, Fuchs D, Bartsch G Jr, Klocker H, et al . Immunohistochemical localization of interleukin-6 and its receptor in benign, premalignant and malignant prostate tissue. J Pathol 2000;191:239-44. |
|83.||Takeshi U, Sadar MD, Suzuki H, Akakura K, Sakamoto S, Shimbo M, et al . Interleukin-4 in patients with prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 2005;25:4595-8. |
|84.||Isaacs JT, Coffey DS. Etiology and disease process of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Suppl 1989;2:33-50. |
|85.||Collins AT, Maitland NJ. Prostate cancer stem cells. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:1213-8. |
[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Endocrine Disruptors and Prostate Cancer
| ||Margherita Corti, Stefano Lorenzetti, Alessandro Ubaldi, Romano Zilli, Daniele Marcoccia |
| ||International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(3): 1216 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Diagnosis and Treatment of Inguinal Hernias after Surgical Treatment of Prostate Cancer, Current State of the Problem
| ||Zhenghao Wu, Xinjian Zhang, Gilbert Charles Morgan, Bocen Li, Yuning Wang, Jiaming Wan, Yi Wang, Penghao Song, Yiyao Jin, Ruijie Zeng, Ming Wei, Chengyun Tang, Jin Zhang |
| ||Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(18): 5423 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Hormone-Dependent Prostate Cancers are Dependent on Rac Signaling for Growth and Survival
| ||Erik T. Goka, Dayrelis T. Mesa Lopez, Marc E. Lippman |
| ||Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2021; 20(6): 1052 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Androgen Signaling Regulates SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Levels and Is Associated with Severe COVID-19 Symptoms in Men
| ||Ryan M. Samuel, Homa Majd, Mikayla N. Richter, Zaniar Ghazizadeh, Seyedeh Maryam Zekavat, Albertas Navickas, Jonathan T. Ramirez, Hosseinali Asgharian, Camille R. Simoneau, Luke R. Bonser, Kyung Duk Koh, Miguel Garcia-Knight, Michel Tassetto, Sara Sunshine, Sina Farahvashi, Ali Kalantari, Wei Liu, Raul Andino, Hongyu Zhao, Pradeep Natarajan, David J. Erle, Melanie Ott, Hani Goodarzi, Faranak Fattahi |
| ||Cell Stem Cell. 2020; 27(6): 876 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Immunoelectron microscope localization of androgen receptors and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in the epithelial cells of albino rat ventral prostate
| ||Noha Gamal Bahey,Ezzat Abd El-Aziz El-Drieny |
| ||Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure. 2015; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|