Indian Journal of Urology Users online:3324  
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

Year : 2004  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 69-70

Renal and ureteral arteriovenous malformation

Dept of Urology, SGPGIMS, Rae Barelli Road, Lucknow, India

Correspondence Address:
Anil Mandhani
Dept of Urology, SGPGIMS, Rae Barelli Road, Lucknow
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions


Keywords: Contrast enhanced CT, IVU, US, RGP, AVM, Radical nephrectomy.

How to cite this article:
Singh KJ, Raghvendran M, Suri A, Mandhani A. Renal and ureteral arteriovenous malformation. Indian J Urol 2004;20:69-70

How to cite this URL:
Singh KJ, Raghvendran M, Suri A, Mandhani A. Renal and ureteral arteriovenous malformation. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2004 [cited 2023 May 30];20:69-70. Available from:

   Case Report Top

A 50 year old male presented with gross total hematuria. Abdominal examination was insignificant. His renal function tests and plain X-ray KUB were normal. Ultrasound revealed clots in renal pelvis with thickened walls. Intravenous urography showed normally excreting right kidney with filling defects [Figure 1]. Contrast enhanced CT scan revealed normally functioning right kidney with thickened walls and multiple collaterals at hilar level [Figure 2]a & b. Cystoscopy revealed hemorrhagic efflux from right side. Diagnostic ureterorenoscopy showed thickened upper ureteral and renal pelvic wall. Subsequently patient was subjected to radical nephrectomy. Histopathology revealed renal and ureteral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) with increased fibrosis in the ureteral wall [Figure 3].

   Comments Top

Two uncommon vascular lesions presenting as intra­renal masses are aneurysms and AVM. AVM's are usually congenital and rare. Hematuria is an uncommon mode of presentation. Though various diagnostic modalities like ultrasound and color Doppler have been described, there is no single specific finding reported. The diagnostic study of choice is arteriography, which is also used for therapeutic means. CT angiography cannot identify these lesions due to small nature of these masses [1] . MR angiography though reported to have a sensitivity of 78%, has drawback of inability to identity small lesions [2] . Often we encounter large collaterals during radical nephrectomies being performed for malignant disease. Hence we feel that the presence of small, multiple (>6), hilarcollaterals as seen in our case is an indicator for presence of AVM. Such patients should undergo diagnostic angiography with embolization in orderto preserve the nephron mass.

   References Top

1.Rottenbeg G, Rankin S: Renal masses in Grainger CRG, Allison DJ, and Adem A et al (Ed): Grainger and Allison's Diagnostic radiology. London, Churchill Livingstone,2001, volume 2, 4th edition, pp 1564-65.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Takebayashi S, Ohno T and Tanka K: MR angiography of renal vascular malformations. Journal of Computer assisted Tomographyl 994,18: 596-600.  Back to cited text no. 2    


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article


   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    [PDF Not available] *
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Case Report

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal